Et Cetera

• Gopley, J. (Ed.) (in press). Mathematics in the early years. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Lesh, R. & Kelly, E. (Eds.). (in press). New methodology in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  
• Kaiser, G., Luna, E., & Huntley, I. (Eds.). (1999). International comparisons in mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.
• Johnston-Wilder, S., Johnston-Wilder, P., Pimm, D., & Westwell, J. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics in the secondary school. London: Routledge.
  
• Orton, A. (Ed.) (1999). Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics. London: Cassell.
  
• Schoenfeld, A. H., Kaput, J., & Dubinsky, E. (Eds.). (1998). Research in collegiate mathematics education, III. Washington, D.C.: American Mathematical Society.
  
• Lampert, M. & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  
• Teppo, A. R. (Ed.). (1998). Qualitative research methods in mathematics education (JRME monograph no. 9). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Beishuizen, M., Gravemeijer, K.P. E., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (Eds.). (1997). The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures. Utrecht:CD-Beta Press.
  
• Steen, L. A. (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomowwow's America. New York: College Entrance Examination.
  
• English, L. D. (1997). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors and images. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  
• Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex, and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  
• Powell, A. B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  
• Cangelosi, J. S. (1996). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  
• Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  
• Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematicalperformance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complexproblem solving (JRME Monograph no. 7). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Biehler, R., Scholz, R. W., Strasser, R., & Winkelmann, B. (Eds.). (1994). Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  
• Schifter, D. & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Storiesof teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  
• Merttens, R. & Vass, J. (Eds.). (1993). Partnerships in maths: Parents and schools:The IMPACT Project. London: The Falmer Press.
  
• Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Lamon, S. J. (Eds.). (1991). Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
  
• Metlina, L. S. (1991). Mathematics in preschool: An aid for the preschool educator. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychologicalproblems in the structuring of school curricula (J. Teller, Trans.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Antonovskii, M. Ya., Boltyanskii, V. G., Volovich, M. B., Krass, E. Yu., & Levitas, G. G. (1990). Sets of mathematics teaching aids. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  
• Connolly, P. & Vilardi, T. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York:Teachers College Press.